台军官训练不遵守则致下属失能 家属泣诉讨公道
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2017 at 17:46 | history | edited | sds | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typos
|
| Jan 14, 2013 at 15:48 | comment | added | Fitri | "It seems elephants has success against cavalry were used most effectively against close formation infantry". What do you mean by this? | |
| Dec 30, 2012 at 13:33 | comment | added | DVK | history.stackexchange.com/questions/6106/… | |
| Dec 30, 2012 at 12:24 | comment | added | Nathan | 6 out of every ten mongol soldiers were generally horse archers and the remaining four lancers and heavier cavalry. I do wonder if by the time of Kublai Khan they were incorporating conquered people into their armies. I do know they used specialist engineers and Kharash in sieges, but that's not quite the same. Also, their tactic playbook seems like it has no place for infantry though. Maybe this should be it's own question. | |
| Dec 30, 2012 at 2:20 | comment | added | DVK | AFAIR, Mongols were nearly 100% cavalry. | |
| Dec 29, 2012 at 13:20 | history | edited | Nathan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 424 characters in body
|
| Dec 29, 2012 at 13:06 | history | answered | Nathan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |